0: Preface
1: Formulating the Mess
2: Ends Planning
3: Means Planning
4: Resource Planning
5: Design of Implementation
6: Design of Controls
7: Epilog
8: Appendix
9: Fundamentals
10: Loose Sections
11: Todo List
Skip to content

3.1.3 Transformation Strategies (R-ARSED)

When a BUMP enters the PTO engine, you must consciously select a Transformation strategy. These strategies represent the application of Agency.

The mathematician and systems theorist Russell Ackoff fundamentally argued that our survival is dependent on our ability to transform the problems we face, in the age we face them, using the tools we have available to us at that time. Bumponomics formalizes this into 6 distinct intervention levers, remembered by the provocative acronym R-ARSED.

1. The R-ARSED Transformation Palette

Depending on the scale of the problem and your available systemic energy, you must choose one of the following six distinct paths:

PlayThe ActionEnergy RequirementTime HorizonSystem Impact
AbsolvingIgnoreLow (Withdrawal)ImmediateProblem persists safely; energy conserved.
ResolvingPatchMedium (Repeated)Short to MediumProblem is suppressed but stays in orbit.
SolvingOptimizeHigh (Analytical)Medium to LongProblem is eliminated by removing the root cause.
EvolvingTranscendMedium (Adaptive)Long-termProblem is absorbed as fuel to mature the system.
DissolvingRedesignHigh (Upfront)PermanentProblem becomes impossible due to a new environment.
RevolvingExploitHigh (Ongoing)IndefiniteProblem is intentionally kept alive for profit or power.

2. Deep Dive: The Mechanics of Transformation

Absolving (A)

  • Diagnostic Question: “Is this problem worth my energy at all?”
  • The Definition: The conscious decision to withdraw effort, attention, or intervention from a problem because engaging with it would cost more than it is worth. The problem is acknowledged—and intentionally left alone.
  • The Essence: Let it be. It is a strategic non-action based on proportionality, not laziness.
  • Key Characteristics: 🧘 Energy withdrawal, ⚖️ Cost–value judgment, 🧠 Conscious choice, 🕊️ Acceptance without struggle.
  • Typical Signals: “This isn’t worth fixing”, “We can live with this”, “The cost of change exceeds the benefit”.
  • Counter-Plays: Refuse to feed a Revolving antagonist with attention. Avoid false Solving.

Resolving (R)

  • Diagnostic Question: “Can this problem be fixed within the current system?”
  • The Definition: Addresses a problem by fixing it within the existing system, restoring normal operation. The problem is repaired, not transformed.
  • The Essence: Fix what’s broken. Resolving assumes the system is fundamentally sound.
  • Key Characteristics: 🔧 Repair-focused, 🧩 Localized intervention, ⏱️ Often repeatable, 🏗️ System preserved.
  • Typical Signals: “Let’s patch it”, “We fixed the issue”, “Back to normal”.
  • Counter-Plays: Demand measurable closure criteria against Revolving loops. Beware: repeated resolving often signals a need for Dissolving.

Solving (S)

  • Diagnostic Question: “Can the root cause be removed?”
  • The Definition: Removes a problem by identifying and eliminating its root cause. The system stays; the cause goes.
  • The Essence: Make it stop happening.
  • Key Characteristics: 🎯 Root-cause focus, 🧠 Analytical, 🛠️ Structural fix, 📉 Reduced recurrence.
  • Typical Signals: “We found the cause”, “This won’t happen again”, “Problem eliminated at source”.
  • Counter-Plays: Demand causal proof over narratives. Beware of misdiagnosing a temporary patch (Resolving) as a structural fix.

Dissolving (D)

  • Diagnostic Question: “What would need to change so this problem could no longer logically exist?”
  • The Definition: Removes a problem entirely by redesigning the system or environment so the conditions that produce the problem disappear. The problem becomes irrelevant.
  • The Essence: Change the game. Dissolving does not fight the problem. It makes the problem mathematically impossible.
  • Key Characteristics: 🧨 Structural redesign, 🏗️ System-level change, 🚀 One-time transformation, ❌ Problem elimination.
  • Typical Signals: “That issue no longer exists”, “We redesigned the system”, “The problem doesn’t apply anymore”.
  • Counter-Plays: Remove baseline incentives that benefit from the problem's persistence.

Evolving (E)

  • Diagnostic Question: “Is the problem part of a broader transition?”
  • The Definition: Treats the problem as fuel for learning and system growth. You grow through the problem, and the problem becomes crucial for the survival of the system it just transformed. You no longer battle it; it is just an enabler of your continued development. The problem transforms us.
  • The Essence: Grow through it.
  • Key Characteristics: 🌱 Developmental, ⏳ Time-based, 🔁 Feedback-driven, 🧭 Directional change.
  • Typical Signals: “We’re becoming better because of this”, “The system is maturing”, “This is shaping our next phase”.
  • Counter-Plays: Separate genuine system learning from antagonist exploitation (Revolving).

Revolving (R) [The Antagonist Strategy]

  • Diagnostic Question: “Who benefits if this problem never ends?”
  • The Definition: The deliberate act of keeping a problem in circulation because its continued existence creates advantage, power, identity, revenue, or control. The problem is not a bug—it’s a feature.
  • The Essence: Keep it alive.
  • Key Characteristics: 🔄 Problem intentionally sustained, ⚡ Continuous energy injection, 🧲 Attracts attention and resources, 🎭 Disguised as ‘trying to solve it’.
  • Typical Signals: “We’re making progress” (without closure), “The crisis continues”, “More funding is needed”.
  • Counter-Plays (Critical): 🧯 Starve it of attention, 📏 Demand end-conditions, 🔍 Expose incentive structures, 🧭 Shift the framing forcefully to Dissolving or Solving.

3. The Politics of Problems: "WHO'S ARSED?"

Transformations do not happen in a vacuum. A problem often persists because it is, in fact, a solution for someone else. To understand why a BUMP isn't shifting, we must look at the human incentives using the "WHO'S" prefix.

WHO'S ARSED Framework

This introduces the critical dimension of political empathy and structural power:

  • W - Weaponizing: Who actively uses this problem as a tool for leverage, budget negotiation, or control?
  • H - Hindering: Who actively blocks genuine solutions because their authority is tied to the manual, broken procedure?
  • O - Orchestrating: Who is the puppet master ensuring the problem's survival conditions remain perfectly aligned?
  • S - Struggling: Who is actually paying the price? Who is bearing the human, financial, and emotional load of this pressure?

By mapping the WHO against the R-ARSED transformations, you immediately expose whether an organization lacks the competence to Solve a problem, or whether a bad actor is quietly Revolving it.

This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.